While Thor: Love and Thunder may have earned its fair share of criticism, one major complaint doesn’t hold as much water as one would think if they were to subscribe to the most vocal online detractors’ points of view. In the film’s third act, Thor “passes his power” to the children of New Asgard, which would rightfully pose the question: why hadn’t Thor ever done so before the events of Thor: Love and Thunder? The main argument is that Thor could have used this power during the events of Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers: Endgame.That would be a valid argument if it were truly his power that the Asgardian icon passed on — but it wasn’t. Using visual cues presented during the scene in question — as well as following the story being relayed on-screen — it becomes clear that Thor didn’t truly pass his power to the children, but the power of Zeus’ lightning bolt. However, it seems a large portion of the audience disregarded this information and misinterpreted what the film laid out. It’s an issue not only with this specific question but with the film as a whole.During the scene where Thor chooses to pass godly powers onto a group of captive Asgardian children, it becomes blatant that the most outspoken critics of the film tuned out and missed the context provided— which is important to note because this development makes perfect sense given the story that comes prior. During his war speech to the newly liberated captives, Thor presented the lightning bolt of Zeus — played to odd perfection by Russell Crowe — so that the frightened children would be reassured in their upcoming moment of rebellion.
While Thor: Love and Thunder may have earned its fair share of criticism, one major complaint doesn’t hold as much water as one would think if they were to subscribe to the most vocal online detractors’ points of view. In the film’s third act, Thor “passes his power” to the children of New Asgard, which would rightfully pose the question: why hadn’t Thor ever done so before the events of Thor: Love and Thunder? The main argument is that Thor could have used this power during the events of Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers: Endgame.
That would be a valid argument if it were truly his power that the Asgardian icon passed on — but it wasn’t. Using visual cues presented during the scene in question — as well as following the story being relayed on-screen — it becomes clear that Thor didn’t truly pass his power to the children, but the power of Zeus’ lightning bolt. However, it seems a large portion of the audience disregarded this information and misinterpreted what the film laid out. It’s an issue not only with this specific question but with the film as a whole.
During the scene where Thor chooses to pass godly powers onto a group of captive Asgardian children, it becomes blatant that the most outspoken critics of the film tuned out and missed the context provided— which is important to note because this development makes perfect sense given the story that comes prior. During his war speech to the newly liberated captives, Thor presented the lightning bolt of Zeus — played to odd perfection by Russell Crowe — so that the frightened children would be reassured in their upcoming moment of rebellion.
#Love #Thunder #Doesnt #Create #Massive #Thor #Plot #Hole #MCU #Fans #Werent #Paying #Attention
Note:- (Not all news on the site expresses the point of view of the site, but we transmit this news automatically and translate it through programmatic technology on the site and not from a human editor. The content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.))
